feat: initial pi-review Docker action

Reusable Gitea/GitHub action that runs Pi coding agent for
AI-powered code reviews on pull requests.

- Docker image based on node:24-slim (112 packages)
- Supports built-in providers (zai, anthropic, openai, deepseek, openrouter)
  and custom OpenAI-compatible endpoints
- Generates git diff (excludes lockfiles/generated code by default)
- Posts review as idempotent PR comment (updates existing on re-run)
- Read-only tools only: agent investigates but never modifies code
- 80KB default diff truncation to stay within LLM context windows
- No curl/python3 dependency — uses Node.js for HTTP and JSON
This commit is contained in:
Markus Hofstetter
2026-05-18 22:09:46 +02:00
commit 28b4b23550
10 changed files with 428 additions and 0 deletions

40
.editorconfig Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
# Editor configuration, see http://editorconfig.org
root = true
[*]
indent_size = 2
indent_style = space
charset = utf-8
end_of_line = lf
max_line_length = 120
insert_final_newline = true
trim_trailing_whitespace = true
[*.java]
# Mutige können die Ausnahme für .java entfernen :)
indent_size = 4
indent_style = space
[*.xml]
# automatisches Umbrechen/Trimmen kann die Semantik vom Inhalt ändern
max_line_length = off
trim_trailing_whitespace = false
# Kompatibilität zu maven-dependency-plugin/maven-release-plugin... und damit zu jgitflow
[pom.xml]
indent_size = 4
indent_style = space
[*.md]
indent_size = 4
max_line_length = off
trim_trailing_whitespace = false
[*.{bat,ps1}]
end_of_line = crlf
[api/src/test/resources/AerzteDocMergerTest/expected/*.txt]
trim_trailing_whitespace = false
[api/src/test/resources/DocMergerTest/expected/*.txt]
trim_trailing_whitespace = false

1
.gitattributes vendored Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
* text=auto eol=lf

4
.gitignore vendored Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
node_modules
.DS_Store
*.log
.vfox

2
.vfox.toml Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
[tools]
nodejs = "24.15.0"

22
Dockerfile Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
FROM node:24-slim
# node:24-slim has ~88 packages (vs 413 in bookworm).
# We only add git for diffing. curl and python3 are replaced by Node.js.
RUN apt-get update && apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends \
git \
&& rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/*
# Install Pi globally — baked into the image, no install at runtime
RUN npm install -g @earendil-works/pi-coding-agent
# Copy action files into the image
COPY prompts/default.md /action/prompts/default.md
COPY scripts/review.sh /action/scripts/review.sh
COPY entrypoint.sh /action/entrypoint.sh
RUN chmod +x /action/entrypoint.sh /action/scripts/review.sh
# Disable Pi's startup network calls
ENV PI_OFFLINE=1
ENTRYPOINT ["/action/entrypoint.sh"]

43
action.yml Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
name: "Pi Code Review"
description: "AI-powered code review using the Pi coding agent framework with any LLM provider"
author: "homa"
inputs:
api_key:
description: "API key for the LLM provider"
required: true
provider:
description: "Pi provider name (zai, anthropic, openai, openrouter, deepseek) or 'custom' for models.json config"
required: false
default: "zai"
model:
description: "Model ID (e.g. glm-4.7, claude-sonnet-4-20250514, gpt-4o)"
required: false
default: "glm-5.1"
base_url:
description: "Custom API base URL (for OpenAI-compatible providers). Ignored for built-in providers."
required: false
default: ""
token:
description: "Git platform token for posting PR comments"
required: true
review_prompt:
description: "Path to a custom review prompt file (relative to calling repo root)"
required: false
default: ""
exclude_patterns:
description: "Space-separated glob patterns to exclude from the diff"
required: false
default: "*.lock package-lock.json yarn.lock pnpm-lock.yaml *.min.js *.min.css *.map"
tools:
description: "Comma-separated tools the agent can use (read-only recommended for CI)"
required: false
default: "read,grep,find,ls"
max_diff_bytes:
description: "Max diff size in bytes before truncation (0 = unlimited)"
required: false
default: "80000"
runs:
using: "docker"
image: "Dockerfile"

29
entrypoint.sh Executable file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -euo pipefail
# ─── Entrypoint for Docker action ────────────────────────────────────────────
# Docker actions receive inputs as INPUT_<NAME> env vars.
# We map them to PI_* vars that review.sh expects, then run the review.
# ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
# Map Docker action inputs to review.sh env vars
export PI_API_KEY="${INPUT_API_KEY}"
export PI_PROVIDER="${INPUT_PROVIDER:-zai}"
export PI_MODEL="${INPUT_MODEL:-glm-5.1}"
export PI_BASE_URL="${INPUT_BASE_URL:-}"
export PI_TOOLS="${INPUT_TOOLS:-read,grep,find,ls}"
export PI_REVIEW_PROMPT="${INPUT_REVIEW_PROMPT:-}"
export PI_EXCLUDE="${INPUT_EXCLUDE_PATTERNS:-*.lock package-lock.json yarn.lock pnpm-lock.yaml *.min.js *.min.css *.map}"
export PI_MAX_DIFF="${INPUT_MAX_DIFF_BYTES:-80000}"
export PI_TOKEN="${INPUT_TOKEN}"
# The calling repo is mounted at GITHUB_WORKSPACE by both GitHub and Gitea.
# cd into it so git commands work against the right repo.
cd "${GITHUB_WORKSPACE:-/github/workspace}"
echo "Workspace: $(pwd)"
echo "Provider: ${PI_PROVIDER}"
echo "Model: ${PI_MODEL}"
# Run the review
bash /action/scripts/review.sh

20
package.json Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
{
"name": "pi-review",
"version": "1.0.0",
"description": "",
"main": "index.js",
"scripts": {
"test": "echo \"Error: no test specified\" && exit 1"
},
"keywords": [],
"author": "",
"license": "ISC",
"devEngines": {
"packageManager": {
"name": "pnpm",
"version": "^11.1.2",
"onFail": "download"
}
},
"type": "module"
}

25
prompts/default.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
You are a senior code reviewer. Review the code changes in this pull request.
Process:
1. Read the git diff at /tmp/pi-diff.txt
2. Read any surrounding files needed for full context
3. Analyze the changes against the criteria below
4. Output a structured review
Review criteria:
- Bugs and logic errors
- Security vulnerabilities (injection, auth bypass, data exposure)
- Error handling gaps (missing null checks, unhandled exceptions)
- Race conditions or concurrency issues
- Breaking changes to public APIs
- Maintainability Issues and Clean Code (DRY, Complexity, Leasts Surprise)
Output format:
- Start with a one-line summary of what this PR does
- List findings grouped by severity:
- 🔴 **Critical**: Must fix before merge (bugs, security)
- 🟡 **Warning**: Should fix (logic gaps, missing error handling)
- 🟢 **Suggestion**: Nice to have (readability, minor improvements)
- End with a verdict: **Approve** or **Request Changes**
- Skip style-only and formatting comments
- If the PR looks good with no issues, say so and approve

242
scripts/review.sh Executable file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,242 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -euo pipefail
# ─── Pi Code Review Action ───────────────────────────────────────────────────
# Configures Pi, generates a diff, runs the agent in --print mode, and posts
# the review as a PR comment. Works with both Gitea and GitHub.
#
# Runs inside a Docker container. Pi is pre-installed in the image.
# The calling repo is at $GITHUB_WORKSPACE (set by the CI platform).
# ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
# ─── Phase 1: Configure Pi ────────────────────────────────────────────────────
echo "::group::Configure Pi"
mkdir -p ~/.pi/agent
AUTH_FILE=~/.pi/agent/auth.json
# Map provider name to auth.json key
case "$PI_PROVIDER" in
zai) AUTH_KEY="zai" ;;
anthropic) AUTH_KEY="anthropic" ;;
openai) AUTH_KEY="openai" ;;
deepseek) AUTH_KEY="deepseek" ;;
openrouter) AUTH_KEY="openrouter" ;;
*) AUTH_KEY="" ;;
esac
if [ -n "$AUTH_KEY" ]; then
# Built-in provider: write auth.json
cat > "$AUTH_FILE" << EOF
{
"${AUTH_KEY}": { "type": "api_key", "key": "${PI_API_KEY}" }
}
EOF
PROVIDER_FLAG="--provider ${PI_PROVIDER}"
else
# Custom provider: write models.json
if [ -z "$PI_BASE_URL" ]; then
echo "::error::Custom provider requires base_url input"
exit 1
fi
cat > ~/.pi/agent/models.json << EOF
{
"providers": {
"custom-review": {
"baseUrl": "${PI_BASE_URL}",
"api": "openai-completions",
"apiKey": "${PI_API_KEY}",
"compat": {
"supportsDeveloperRole": false,
"supportsReasoningEffort": false
},
"models": [
{
"id": "${PI_MODEL}",
"reasoning": false,
"input": ["text"],
"contextWindow": 128000,
"maxTokens": 16384
}
]
}
}
}
EOF
PROVIDER_FLAG="--provider custom-review"
fi
chmod 600 "$AUTH_FILE"
echo "Configured provider: ${PI_PROVIDER}"
echo "::endgroup::"
# ─── Phase 2: Generate diff ───────────────────────────────────────────────────
echo "::group::Generate diff"
# Ensure we have full history (runner may have done a shallow checkout)
git fetch --unshallow --filter=blob:none origin 2>/dev/null || true
git fetch origin main 2>/dev/null || git fetch origin master 2>/dev/null || true
BASE="origin/main"
if ! git rev-parse --verify "$BASE" >/dev/null 2>&1; then
BASE="origin/master"
fi
# Build exclude pathspecs
EXCLUDE_ARGS=""
for pattern in $PI_EXCLUDE; do
EXCLUDE_ARGS="$EXCLUDE_ARGS ':!$pattern'"
done
eval "git diff ${BASE}...HEAD ${EXCLUDE_ARGS}" > /tmp/pi-diff.txt 2>/dev/null || true
# Truncate if needed
if [ "${PI_MAX_DIFF}" -gt 0 ]; then
head -c "${PI_MAX_DIFF}" /tmp/pi-diff.txt > /tmp/pi-diff-trunc.txt
mv /tmp/pi-diff-trunc.txt /tmp/pi-diff.txt
fi
DIFF_SIZE=$(wc -c < /tmp/pi-diff.txt || echo 0)
echo "Diff size: ${DIFF_SIZE} bytes"
echo "::endgroup::"
if [ "${DIFF_SIZE}" -eq 0 ]; then
echo "No changes to review. Skipping."
exit 0
fi
# ─── Phase 3: Run Pi ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
echo "::group::Run Pi review"
# Prompt: custom (from calling repo) or default (baked into Docker image)
ACTION_DIR="/action"
if [ -n "${PI_REVIEW_PROMPT}" ] && [ -f "${PI_REVIEW_PROMPT}" ]; then
PROMPT=$(cat "${PI_REVIEW_PROMPT}")
echo "Using custom prompt: ${PI_REVIEW_PROMPT}"
else
PROMPT=$(cat "${ACTION_DIR}/prompts/default.md")
echo "Using default prompt"
fi
# Append diff instruction
PROMPT="${PROMPT}
The git diff is at /tmp/pi-diff.txt. Start by reading it, then read any files you need for full context."
# Run Pi in print mode (non-interactive, no session persistence)
pi --no-session \
${PROVIDER_FLAG} \
--model "${PI_MODEL}" \
--tools "${PI_TOOLS}" \
-p "${PROMPT}" \
> /tmp/pi-review.md 2>/dev/null
if [ ! -s /tmp/pi-review.md ]; then
echo "::error::Pi generated no output"
exit 1
fi
echo "Review generated successfully."
echo "::endgroup::"
# ─── Phase 4: Post comment ────────────────────────────────────────────────────
echo "::group::Post review comment"
# Detect Gitea vs GitHub
if [ -n "${GITEA_SERVER_URL:-}" ]; then
API_BASE="${GITEA_SERVER_URL}/api/v1"
PR_NUMBER="${GITEA_EVENT_PULL_REQUEST_NUMBER:-}"
REPO="${GITEA_REPOSITORY:-}"
else
API_BASE="${GITHUB_API_URL:-https://api.github.com}"
PR_NUMBER="${GITHUB_EVENT_PULL_REQUEST_NUMBER:-}"
REPO="${GITHUB_REPOSITORY:-}"
fi
if [ -z "$PR_NUMBER" ]; then
echo "Not a pull request event. Review written to /tmp/pi-review.md only."
echo "::endgroup::"
exit 0
fi
MARKER="<!-- pi-code-review -->"
# Use Node.js for all HTTP and JSON — avoids needing curl in the image.
# Node's built-in https module is already available since we need it for Pi.
node -e "
const http = require('http');
const https = require('https');
const fs = require('fs');
const apiBase = '${API_BASE}';
const repo = '${REPO}';
const prNumber = '${PR_NUMBER}';
const token = '${PI_TOKEN}';
const marker = '${MARKER}';
const review = fs.readFileSync('/tmp/pi-review.md', 'utf8');
const body = '## Pi Code Review\n\n' + review + '\n\n' + marker;
function apiRequest(method, path, data) {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
const url = new URL(apiBase + path);
const transport = url.protocol === 'http:' ? http : https;
const options = {
hostname: url.hostname,
port: url.port || (url.protocol === 'http:' ? 80 : 443),
path: url.pathname + url.search,
method,
headers: {
'Authorization': 'token ' + token,
'Content-Type': 'application/json',
},
};
const req = transport.request(options, (res) => {
let body = '';
res.on('data', (chunk) => { body += chunk; });
res.on('end', () => {
if (res.statusCode >= 200 && res.statusCode < 300) {
try { resolve(JSON.parse(body)); } catch { resolve(null); }
} else {
console.error('API error ' + res.statusCode + ': ' + body.slice(0, 200));
resolve(null);
}
});
});
req.on('error', (e) => { console.error('Request failed:', e.message); resolve(null); });
if (data) req.write(JSON.stringify(data));
req.end();
});
}
async function main() {
// Find existing review comment
const comments = await apiRequest('GET', '/repos/' + repo + '/issues/' + prNumber + '/comments');
let existingId = null;
if (Array.isArray(comments)) {
for (const c of comments) {
if (c.body && c.body.includes(marker)) {
existingId = c.id;
break;
}
}
}
const payload = { body };
if (existingId) {
console.log('Updating existing comment ' + existingId);
await apiRequest('PATCH', '/repos/' + repo + '/issues/comments/' + existingId, payload);
console.log('Comment updated.');
} else {
console.log('Creating new review comment');
await apiRequest('POST', '/repos/' + repo + '/issues/' + prNumber + '/comments', payload);
console.log('Comment posted.');
}
}
main().catch((e) => { console.error(e.message); process.exit(1); });
"
echo "::endgroup::"