pi-review/scripts/review.sh

#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -euo pipefail

# ─── Pi Code Review Action ───────────────────────────────────────────────────
# Configures Pi, generates a diff, runs the agent in --print mode, and posts
# the review as a PR comment. Works with both Gitea and GitHub.
#
# Runs inside a Docker container. Pi is pre-installed in the image.
# The calling repo is at $GITHUB_WORKSPACE (set by the CI platform).
# ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

# ─── Phase 1: Configure Pi ────────────────────────────────────────────────────
echo "::group::Configure Pi"
mkdir -p ~/.pi/agent

AUTH_FILE=~/.pi/agent/auth.json

# Map provider name to auth.json key
case "$PI_PROVIDER" in
  zai)         AUTH_KEY="zai" ;;
  anthropic)   AUTH_KEY="anthropic" ;;
  openai)      AUTH_KEY="openai" ;;
  deepseek)    AUTH_KEY="deepseek" ;;
  openrouter)  AUTH_KEY="openrouter" ;;
  *)           AUTH_KEY="" ;;
esac

if [ -n "$AUTH_KEY" ]; then
  # Built-in provider: write auth.json
  cat > "$AUTH_FILE" << EOF
{
  "${AUTH_KEY}": { "type": "api_key", "key": "${PI_API_KEY}" }
}
EOF
  PROVIDER_FLAG="--provider ${PI_PROVIDER}"
else
  # Custom provider: write models.json
  if [ -z "$PI_BASE_URL" ]; then
    echo "::error::Custom provider requires base_url input"
    exit 1
  fi
  cat > ~/.pi/agent/models.json << EOF
{
  "providers": {
    "custom-review": {
      "baseUrl": "${PI_BASE_URL}",
      "api": "openai-completions",
      "apiKey": "${PI_API_KEY}",
      "compat": {
        "supportsDeveloperRole": false,
        "supportsReasoningEffort": false
      },
      "models": [
        {
          "id": "${PI_MODEL}",
          "reasoning": false,
          "input": ["text"],
          "contextWindow": 128000,
          "maxTokens": 16384
        }
      ]
    }
  }
}
EOF
  PROVIDER_FLAG="--provider custom-review"
fi

chmod 600 "$AUTH_FILE"
echo "Configured provider: ${PI_PROVIDER}"
echo "::endgroup::"

# ─── Phase 2: Generate diff ───────────────────────────────────────────────────
echo "::group::Generate diff"

# Ensure we have full history (runner may have done a shallow checkout)
git fetch --unshallow --filter=blob:none origin 2>/dev/null || true
git fetch origin main 2>/dev/null || git fetch origin master 2>/dev/null || true

BASE="origin/main"
if ! git rev-parse --verify "$BASE" >/dev/null 2>&1; then
  BASE="origin/master"
fi

# Build exclude pathspecs
EXCLUDE_ARGS=""
for pattern in $PI_EXCLUDE; do
  EXCLUDE_ARGS="$EXCLUDE_ARGS ':!$pattern'"
done

eval "git diff ${BASE}...HEAD ${EXCLUDE_ARGS}" > /tmp/pi-diff.txt 2>/dev/null || true

# Truncate if needed
if [ "${PI_MAX_DIFF}" -gt 0 ]; then
  head -c "${PI_MAX_DIFF}" /tmp/pi-diff.txt > /tmp/pi-diff-trunc.txt
  mv /tmp/pi-diff-trunc.txt /tmp/pi-diff.txt
fi

DIFF_SIZE=$(wc -c < /tmp/pi-diff.txt || echo 0)
echo "Diff size: ${DIFF_SIZE} bytes"
echo "::endgroup::"

if [ "${DIFF_SIZE}" -eq 0 ]; then
  echo "No changes to review. Skipping."
  exit 0
fi

# ─── Phase 3: Run Pi ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
echo "::group::Run Pi review"

# Prompt: custom (from calling repo) or default (baked into Docker image)
ACTION_DIR="/action"

if [ -n "${PI_REVIEW_PROMPT}" ] && [ -f "${PI_REVIEW_PROMPT}" ]; then
  PROMPT=$(cat "${PI_REVIEW_PROMPT}")
  echo "Using custom prompt: ${PI_REVIEW_PROMPT}"
else
  PROMPT=$(cat "${ACTION_DIR}/prompts/default.md")
  echo "Using default prompt"
fi

# Append diff instruction
PROMPT="${PROMPT}

The git diff is at /tmp/pi-diff.txt. Start by reading it, then read any files you need for full context."

# Run Pi in print mode (non-interactive, no session persistence)
pi --no-session \
  ${PROVIDER_FLAG} \
  --model "${PI_MODEL}" \
  --tools "${PI_TOOLS}" \
  -p "${PROMPT}" \
  > /tmp/pi-review.md 2>/dev/null

if [ ! -s /tmp/pi-review.md ]; then
  echo "::error::Pi generated no output"
  exit 1
fi

echo "Review generated successfully."
echo "::endgroup::"

# ─── Phase 4: Post comment ────────────────────────────────────────────────────
echo "::group::Post review comment"

# Detect Gitea vs GitHub
if [ -n "${GITEA_SERVER_URL:-}" ]; then
  API_BASE="${GITEA_SERVER_URL}/api/v1"
  PR_NUMBER="${GITEA_EVENT_PULL_REQUEST_NUMBER:-}"
  REPO="${GITEA_REPOSITORY:-}"
else
  API_BASE="${GITHUB_API_URL:-https://api.github.com}"
  PR_NUMBER="${GITHUB_EVENT_PULL_REQUEST_NUMBER:-}"
  REPO="${GITHUB_REPOSITORY:-}"
fi

if [ -z "$PR_NUMBER" ]; then
  echo "Not a pull request event. Review written to /tmp/pi-review.md only."
  echo "::endgroup::"
  exit 0
fi

MARKER="<!-- pi-code-review -->"

# Use Node.js for all HTTP and JSON — avoids needing curl in the image.
# Node's built-in https module is already available since we need it for Pi.
node -e "
const http = require('http');
const https = require('https');
const fs = require('fs');

const apiBase = '${API_BASE}';
const repo = '${REPO}';
const prNumber = '${PR_NUMBER}';
const token = '${PI_TOKEN}';
const marker = '${MARKER}';

const review = fs.readFileSync('/tmp/pi-review.md', 'utf8');
const body = '## Pi Code Review\n\n' + review + '\n\n' + marker;

function apiRequest(method, path, data) {
  return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
    const url = new URL(apiBase + path);
    const transport = url.protocol === 'http:' ? http : https;
    const options = {
      hostname: url.hostname,
      port: url.port || (url.protocol === 'http:' ? 80 : 443),
      path: url.pathname + url.search,
      method,
      headers: {
        'Authorization': 'token ' + token,
        'Content-Type': 'application/json',
      },
    };
    const req = transport.request(options, (res) => {
      let body = '';
      res.on('data', (chunk) => { body += chunk; });
      res.on('end', () => {
        if (res.statusCode >= 200 && res.statusCode < 300) {
          try { resolve(JSON.parse(body)); } catch { resolve(null); }
        } else {
          console.error('API error ' + res.statusCode + ': ' + body.slice(0, 200));
          resolve(null);
        }
      });
    });
    req.on('error', (e) => { console.error('Request failed:', e.message); resolve(null); });
    if (data) req.write(JSON.stringify(data));
    req.end();
  });
}

async function main() {
  // Find existing review comment
  const comments = await apiRequest('GET', '/repos/' + repo + '/issues/' + prNumber + '/comments');
  let existingId = null;
  if (Array.isArray(comments)) {
    for (const c of comments) {
      if (c.body && c.body.includes(marker)) {
        existingId = c.id;
        break;
      }
    }
  }

  const payload = { body };

  if (existingId) {
    console.log('Updating existing comment ' + existingId);
    await apiRequest('PATCH', '/repos/' + repo + '/issues/comments/' + existingId, payload);
    console.log('Comment updated.');
  } else {
    console.log('Creating new review comment');
    await apiRequest('POST', '/repos/' + repo + '/issues/' + prNumber + '/comments', payload);
    console.log('Comment posted.');
  }
}

main().catch((e) => { console.error(e.message); process.exit(1); });
"

echo "::endgroup::"